Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 June 20213258223

43c Amott Road, London, SE15 4HU

Planning appeal 3258223 at 43c Amott Road, London, SE15 4HU (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 7 June 2021 by Inspector Miell C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: sufficiency of as-built drawings to determine the extent of unauthorised works.

construction of part ground and first floor rear extension with loft conversion (rear dormer and 3x front facing rooflights) and internal restructuring to create 1x additional flat without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 17/AP/1711, dated 28 June 2017

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Miell C
Postcode
SE15 4HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: sufficiency of as-built drawings to determine the extent of unauthorised works
  • Appeal D: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The Inspector's site observations confirmed that the constructed loft conversion, including the enlarged rear dormer and additional rooflight, achieved an acceptable relationship with the host building and local context, and that the repositioned glazed balustrade would adequately protect neighbouring privacy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Saved Policy 3.12 of the Southwark Plan (2007)Saved Policy 3.13 of the Southwark Plan (2007)Policy 12 of the Southwark Council Core Strategy (2011)Policy 3.2 of the Southwark PlanPolicy D3 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 48Paragraph 127

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

377 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld7 April 20263361416
    12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  2. Dismissed7 April 20263344253
    Flat 1, 12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  3. Notice varied and upheld5 February 20263364196
    211 Walworth Road, London, SE17 1RL
  4. Notice varied and upheld7 January 20263354856
    96 Goodrich Road, London, SE22 0ER
  5. Notice upheld7 January 20263337227
    32 Meeting House Lane, London, SE15 2UN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.