Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 April 20223258321

55-69 Rothbury Road, London, E9 5HA

Planning appeal 3258321 at 55-69 Rothbury Road, London, E9 5HA (London Legacy Development Corporation) was dismissed on 11 April 2022 by Inspector Cliff D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue for both Appeals A and B is whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for affordable housing, taking account of the viability for each scheme.

the demolition of the existing buildings and redevelopment for a development with a part basement/part 6/part 7 storey mixed use building to provide for 252.3m² B1 class and 28 residential units

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Cliff D
Postcode
E9 5HA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue for both Appeals A and B is whether the proposed development would make satisfactory provision for affordable housing, taking account of the viability for each scheme.

What decided it

The finding that both schemes could viably deliver a greater, policy-compliant proportion of affordable housing than proposed, meaning the shortfall conflicted significantly with the development plan.

the benefits of the schemes, including housing delivery and modest economic benefits, were outweighed by the significant harm arising from conflict with the development plan's affordable housing policies

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H5Policy SP2Policy H1Policy H2Policy H4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

280 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Legacy Development Corporation

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Unknown8 May 20253352467
    Pavement Opposite Stratford Shopping Centre, Unit K2, Stratford, London, E15 1DE
  2. Dismissed8 May 20253352465
    Pavement Opposite Stratford Shopping Centre, Unit K2, Stratford, London, E15 1DE
  3. Unknown7 May 20253352470
    Pavement Outside Unex Tower, 7 Station Street, Stratford, London, E15 1DA
  4. Dismissed7 May 20253352469
    Pavement Outside Unex Tower, 7 Station Street, Stratford, London, E15 1DA
  5. Dismissed7 April 20253349784
    11 A to 11 C , Chapman Road , Hackney , London , E9 5DW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.