Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20213258368

31 Clayhill Crescent, Grove Park, London, SE9 4JA

Planning appeal 3258368 at 31 Clayhill Crescent, Grove Park, London, SE9 4JA (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 9 July 2021 by Inspector Bell-Williamson J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene.

end of terrace dwelling attached to existing dwelling owned by applicant on land containing an existing detached garage to be demolished

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J
Postcode
SE9 4JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the street scene

What decided it

The proposed dwelling would have a contrived and cramped appearance with uncharacteristic features that would not respond positively to the uniform character of the existing terrace, resulting in material harm to the street scene.

The benefit of housing supply, including small properties, was outweighed by the material harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development not engaged.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 15 of the Lewisham Core Strategy (2011)Spatial Policy 5 of the Lewisham Core Strategy (2011)DM Policy 30 of the Development Management Local Plan (2014)DM Policy 32 of the Development Management Local Plan (2014)DM Policy 33 of the Development Management Local Plan (2014)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 2Paragraph 11Paragraph 212Paragraph 213

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

274 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed23 October 20266013784
    58a Manor Park, Hither Green, London, SE13 5RL
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011958
    Plot to the Rear of 4 Wickham Road, Wickham Mews, London, SE4 1PS
  3. Allowed24 September 20266014022
    30 Horncastle Road, Lee, London, SE12 9LA
  4. Dismissed11 September 20266009541
    32, Bromley Road, London, SE6 2TP
  5. Allowed11 September 20266004929
    1 - 3A Doggett Road, London, SE6 4PZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.