Planning appeal decision
Former B&Q, Great Stone Road, Old Trafford, Trafford, M32 0YP
Planning appeal 3258552 at Former B&Q, Great Stone Road, Old Trafford, Trafford, M32 0YP (Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 May 2022 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
the demolition of existing retail unit and associated structures; erection of buildings for a mix of use including: 332 apartments (use class C3) and communal spaces ancillary to the residential use; flexible space for use classes A1, A3, D1 and/or D2; undercroft car parking; new public realm; and associated engineering works and infrastructure
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- M32 0YP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the effect of noise from activities at Emirates Old Trafford (EOT) would result in acceptable living conditions for future occupants of the proposed development, and whether, as a consequence, unreasonable restrictions may be placed on LCCC's operations
- whether future occupants of the proposed development would have acceptable living conditions, with regards to amenity space provision, outlook, sunlight and daylight
- whether the proposed development would have an overbearing effect on the living conditions of the occupants of residential properties on Great Stone Road, Trent Bridge Walk, Gorse Avenue and Gorse Crescent, having regard to its height, massing, scale and layout
- whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision in terms of affordable housing and education, having regard to viability
- the effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of Longford Park Conservation Area and on the setting of nearby listed buildings
- the effect of the proposed development on EOT, a non-designated heritage asset and an internationally significant visitor attraction, cultural and tourism venue
- the effect of the proposed development on the fine turf and non-turf training facility at EOT
- the effect of the proposed development on the safety of vehicular and pedestrian users of the access to the site, EOT and Great Stone Road
What decided it
The combination of substantial harm to character and appearance from the scheme's design and a significant, largely unmitigated adverse noise effect on future occupants (with associated risk to LCCC's concert operations) meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even under the tilted balance.
The considerable benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, brownfield reuse and economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, the significant adverse noise effect on future occupants and risk to LCCC's operations, and further harm to living conditions and amenity space usability, such that under the tilted balance the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SL3Policy L7Policy L5.13Policy L7.3Policy L3Policy R1Policy R6Policy L4Policy L4.7Policy L7.2Policy L2Policy L2.9Policy L2.12Policy L2.2Policy SL3.2Policy SL3.4Policy L8.3Policy L8.4Strategic Objective OTO11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 125Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 185Paragraph 187Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed26 August 20266010095846 Chester Road, Stretford, Trafford, M32 0QJ
- Allowed14 August 20266008227Land At Rear Of 30 Croftsbank Road, And To Side Of 5 Primrose Avenue, Urmston, M41 0TY
- Dismissed26 June 2026600474222 Clarence Road, Hale, Trafford, WA15 8SF
- Notice upheld29 April 2026337246445 Princess Road, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5ST
- Dismissed22 April 2026600315748 Alphonsus Street, Manchester, Gt Man, M16 7QS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®