Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 May 20223258552

Former B&Q, Great Stone Road, Old Trafford, Trafford, M32 0YP

Planning appeal 3258552 at Former B&Q, Great Stone Road, Old Trafford, Trafford, M32 0YP (Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 May 2022 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the demolition of existing retail unit and associated structures; erection of buildings for a mix of use including: 332 apartments (use class C3) and communal spaces ancillary to the residential use; flexible space for use classes A1, A3, D1 and/or D2; undercroft car parking; new public realm; and associated engineering works and infrastructure

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McGlone A
Postcode
M32 0YP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the effect of noise from activities at Emirates Old Trafford (EOT) would result in acceptable living conditions for future occupants of the proposed development, and whether, as a consequence, unreasonable restrictions may be placed on LCCC's operations
  • whether future occupants of the proposed development would have acceptable living conditions, with regards to amenity space provision, outlook, sunlight and daylight
  • whether the proposed development would have an overbearing effect on the living conditions of the occupants of residential properties on Great Stone Road, Trent Bridge Walk, Gorse Avenue and Gorse Crescent, having regard to its height, massing, scale and layout
  • whether or not the proposed development would make adequate provision in terms of affordable housing and education, having regard to viability
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of Longford Park Conservation Area and on the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • the effect of the proposed development on EOT, a non-designated heritage asset and an internationally significant visitor attraction, cultural and tourism venue
  • the effect of the proposed development on the fine turf and non-turf training facility at EOT
  • the effect of the proposed development on the safety of vehicular and pedestrian users of the access to the site, EOT and Great Stone Road

What decided it

The combination of substantial harm to character and appearance from the scheme's design and a significant, largely unmitigated adverse noise effect on future occupants (with associated risk to LCCC's concert operations) meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even under the tilted balance.

The considerable benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, brownfield reuse and economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, the significant adverse noise effect on future occupants and risk to LCCC's operations, and further harm to living conditions and amenity space usability, such that under the tilted balance the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SL3Policy L7Policy L5.13Policy L7.3Policy L3Policy R1Policy R6Policy L4Policy L4.7Policy L7.2Policy L2Policy L2.9Policy L2.12Policy L2.2Policy SL3.2Policy SL3.4Policy L8.3Policy L8.4Strategic Objective OTO11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 125Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 185Paragraph 187Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

108 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed26 August 20266010095
    846 Chester Road, Stretford, Trafford, M32 0QJ
  2. Allowed14 August 20266008227
    Land At Rear Of 30 Croftsbank Road, And To Side Of 5 Primrose Avenue, Urmston, M41 0TY
  3. Dismissed26 June 20266004742
    22 Clarence Road, Hale, Trafford, WA15 8SF
  4. Notice upheld29 April 20263372464
    45 Princess Road, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5ST
  5. Dismissed22 April 20266003157
    48 Alphonsus Street, Manchester, Gt Man, M16 7QS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.