Planning appeal decision
Woodlands Farm Mearcombe Lane, Bleadon, Weston-Super-Mare, BS24 0NZ
Planning appeal 3259117 at Woodlands Farm Mearcombe Lane, Bleadon, Weston-Super-Mare, BS24 0NZ (North Somerset Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 11 January 2022 by Inspector Freer P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development conserves or enhances the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB.
described as a dwelling, agricultural building, residential curtilage, mixed storage and residential curtilage building. Summary
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Freer P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development conserves or enhances the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB
- whether the buildings are necessary for and ancillary to the use of the land for a viable agricultural or land based rural business
- whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a Certificate of Lawful Use or Development (LDC) was well founded
What decided it
Whether the relevant statutory immunity periods (four years for the operational development, ten years for the change of use) had elapsed before the enforcement notices were issued, together with the unproven necessity/viability of the agricultural buildings under Policy DM51, determined the outcome of each appeal.
the harm to the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB and the unproven necessity/viability of the agricultural buildings were not outweighed by any material considerations, so the ground (a) appeals failed and planning permission was refused
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS5Policy CS12Policy DM10Policy DM11Policy DM51Policy DM32Policy RD/1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 176
- Judgments
- Oates v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Welwyn Hatfield v SSCLG and Beesley [2011] UKSC15; Jackson v SSCLG [2015] EWHC 20 (Admin); Bonsall and Jackson [2015] EWCA Civ 1246; Arun DC v First Secretary of State [2006] EWCA Civ 117; [2007] 1 WLR 523; Murfitt v SSE & East Cambridgeshire DC [1980] JPL 598; Kestrel Hydro v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWHC 1654 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice upheld16 April 202633730678 Spring Valley, Weston Super Mare, BS22 9AS
- Notice upheld16 April 202633730668 Spring Valley, Weston Super Mare, BS22 9AS
- Notice upheld16 April 202633730637 Spring Valley, Weston-Super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 9AS
- Notice upheld30 March 20263368012Scars Farm , Lye Hole Lane, Redhill, Bristol, BS40 5TB
- Notice upheld26 March 20263346026Queensmead Farm Bristol Road, Winscombe, BS25 1PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®