Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 September 20213259858

Wood Farm, Helmingham Road , Otley, IP6 9NS

described on the application form as “Development of up to five dwellings

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Mineral working
Inspector
Fallon R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is in an appropriate location, with particular regard to the adopted development plan settlement hierarchy and access to shops, services, community facilities and transport choices other than the private car

What decided it

The appeal site's location outside the settlement boundary in countryside, combined with poor accessibility to shops, services and sustainable transport, making it an inappropriate location for residential development contrary to the development plan and NPPF sustainability principles.

The limited benefits of housing delivery and local employment were outweighed by the conflict with the development plan, the unsustainable location with heavy car dependence, and the harmful visual intrusion into the open countryside landscape.

Framework references: 9, 12, 79, 92, 104, 105, 110

Plan policies cited: Policy SCLP3.2, Policy SCLP3.3, Policy SCLP5.3, Policy SCLP5.4, Policy SCLP5.7, Policy SCLP5.11, Policy SCLP7.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.