Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 August 20213260183

95-111 Tyburn Road, Birmingham, B24 8NQ

Planning appeal 3260183 at 95-111 Tyburn Road, Birmingham, B24 8NQ (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 25 August 2021 by Inspector Seaton M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area.

a free-standing monopole incorporating 2 x LED media screens each 5 m wide x 7.5 m high

Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Seaton M
Postcode
B24 8NQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area
  • the effect of the advertisement on public safety, having regard to motorists

What decided it

The proposed advertisement would not result in adverse impacts on amenity or public safety when assessed against the Framework paragraph 136 test and subject to appropriate conditions controlling luminance, animation and hours of operation.

The visual prominence and scale of the advertisement were outweighed by the established commercial context of the M6 corridor and the absence of compelling evidence of public safety harm, with conditions ensuring mitigation of amenity and safety concerns.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017saved Paragraphs 3.14C & 3.14 D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005Location of Advertisement Hoardings Supplementary Planning Guidance, 1998
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 136

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

59 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011902
    Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
  2. Dismissed19 August 20266008960
    2 Leslie Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, B20 3NU
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266006967
    123 Digbeth Road, Nechells, Birmingham, B12 0JU
  4. Allowed26 May 20266004581
    Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ
  5. Allowed26 May 20266004579
    Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.