Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 August 20213260183

95-111 Tyburn Road, Birmingham, B24 8NQ

a free-standing monopole incorporating 2 x LED media screens each 5 m wide x 7.5 m high

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Seaton M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area
  • the effect of the advertisement on public safety, having regard to motorists

What decided it

The proposed advertisement would not result in adverse impacts on amenity or public safety when assessed against the Framework paragraph 136 test and subject to appropriate conditions controlling luminance, animation and hours of operation.

The visual prominence and scale of the advertisement were outweighed by the established commercial context of the M6 corridor and the absence of compelling evidence of public safety harm, with conditions ensuring mitigation of amenity and safety concerns.

Framework references: 136

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017, saved Paragraphs 3.14C & 3.14 D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005, Location of Advertisement Hoardings Supplementary Planning Guidance, 1998

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.