Planning appeal decision
95-111 Tyburn Road, Birmingham, B24 8NQ
Planning appeal 3260183 at 95-111 Tyburn Road, Birmingham, B24 8NQ (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 25 August 2021 by Inspector Seaton M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area.
a free-standing monopole incorporating 2 x LED media screens each 5 m wide x 7.5 m high
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Seaton M
- Postcode
- B24 8NQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area
- the effect of the advertisement on public safety, having regard to motorists
What decided it
The proposed advertisement would not result in adverse impacts on amenity or public safety when assessed against the Framework paragraph 136 test and subject to appropriate conditions controlling luminance, animation and hours of operation.
The visual prominence and scale of the advertisement were outweighed by the established commercial context of the M6 corridor and the absence of compelling evidence of public safety harm, with conditions ensuring mitigation of amenity and safety concerns.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017saved Paragraphs 3.14C & 3.14 D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005Location of Advertisement Hoardings Supplementary Planning Guidance, 1998
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 136
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 October 20266011902Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
- Dismissed19 August 202660089602 Leslie Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, B20 3NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006967123 Digbeth Road, Nechells, Birmingham, B12 0JU
- Allowed26 May 20266004581Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ
- Allowed26 May 20266004579Footpath Outside, 100 New Street, Birmingham, B2 4HQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®