Planning appeal decision
11 Walworth Road, Picket Piece, Andover, SP11 6XW
Planning appeal 3260339 at 11 Walworth Road, Picket Piece, Andover, SP11 6XW (Test Valley Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 July 2021 by Inspector Wilkinson S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The proposed location of development having regard to both local and national policies.
residential development of 64 No. dwellings, associated landscaping, amenity areas and access from Walworth Road
- Authority
- Test Valley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wilkinson S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The proposed location of development having regard to both local and national policies
- The effect of the proposed development on the landscape character of the area
- Whether or not the appeal scheme would increase flood risk
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to noise, the provision of private and public open space, parking, privacy and designing out crime
- The effects of the proposal on nutrient levels within the Solent estuary
- The effects of the proposals on biodiversity with particular regard to protected species
- Whether or not the proposals include adequate provision for the necessary infrastructure directly required by this development
- Whether a policy compliant amount of affordable housing has been included within the scheme
What decided it
The cumulative conflict of the scheme's location, design, living-condition and biodiversity shortcomings with multiple development plan policies was not outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery.
the economic, social and environmental benefits of housing delivery were an important material consideration but were not outweighed by the proposal's conflict with the development plan policies taken as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy COM2Policy COM6Policy E1Policy E2Policy E5Policy E7Policy E8Policy LHW1Policy LHW4Policy T2Policy CS1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v.SSE (JPL 1982 P37); People Over Wind and Peter Sweetman v Collite Teoranta ECJ (2018) C-323/17
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Test Valley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed26 October 20266012951Barn South Of Former Poultry Houses, Monxton Road, Grateley, SP11 8JG
- Dismissed3 September 20266008234Landfall Annexe, Landfall, Chilworth Road, Chilworth,Romsey, SO16 7LA
- Dismissed22 July 20266007351The Star and Garter, 2 High Street, Andover, SP10 1NX
- Dismissed8 July 2026600613893 Saddle Way, Andover, SP11 6XP
- Allowed18 June 20266007020The Boot Inn, High Street, Shipton Bellinger, SP9 7UF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®