Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 June 20213260507

Blackhorse Tower, Holbrook House and , Churchwood House Cockfosters Road, Barnet, EN4 0DR

Planning appeal 3260507 at Blackhorse Tower, Holbrook House and , Churchwood House Cockfosters Road, Barnet, EN4 0DR (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 24 June 2021 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: (i) whether the proposed external works are permitted under Class O and the impacts of noise from commercial premises on intended occupiers; (ii) transport and highway impacts.

Change of use from offices (B1(a)) to residential (C3) to provide 197 residential units within the buildings of Blackhorse Tower, Holbrook House And Churchwood House, 116 Cockfosters Road and land within its curtilage for associated use. All habitable rooms will be furnished with large windows on the external facade to ensure the provision of adequate natural light

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Philpott M
Postcode
EN4 0DY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: (i) whether the proposed external works are permitted under Class O and the impacts of noise from commercial premises on intended occupiers; (ii) transport and highway impacts
  • Appeal B: transport and highway impacts

What decided it

For Appeal A, the inadequate accessibility of cycle parking facilities; for Appeal B, the absence of significant transport and highway impacts despite the indicated overprovision of car parking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T6.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 102Paragraph 108
Judgments
R (on the application of Patel) v SSCLG & Johal & Wandsworth Borough Council [2016] EWHC 3354 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

325 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.