Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20213260919

71 Glenham Drive, Ilford, IG2 6SF

Planning appeal 3260919 at 71 Glenham Drive, Ilford, IG2 6SF (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 28 June 2021 by Inspector Jarvis P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of garage and erection of one bedroom bungalow

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jarvis P
Postcode
IG2 6SF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether adequate private amenity space would be provided and maintained for future and existing occupants
  • the effect on living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining property
  • the effect on highway safety
  • the impact on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The proposal would appear as an incongruous and independent dwelling that would not be sympathetic to the established character of the area, combined with inadequate private amenity space and failure to secure mitigation for SAC impacts.

the limited contribution to housing supply and effective use of land did not outweigh the identified harms to character and appearance, private amenity space standards, and ecological mitigation requirements

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP2021 Policy D3LP Policy LP26LP Policy LP29LP Policy LP23LP Policy LP39

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

472 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.