Planning appeal decision
Landmark Heights, 172 Daubeney Road, Homerton Hackney, E5 0EN
Planning appeal 3260973 at Landmark Heights, 172 Daubeney Road, Homerton Hackney, E5 0EN (London Borough of Hackney) was allowed on 2 October 2023 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
telecommunications rooftop installation upgrade and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Hackney
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Aqbal M
- Postcode
- E5 0EN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed telecommunications apparatus would not result in any unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, particularly given that Landmark Heights already supports existing telecommunications apparatus and the proposal is an upgrade rather than a new installation.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hackney
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed16 July 20243330875Mare Street Studios , 203-213 Mare Street, London , E8 3QE
- Dismissed15 July 20243337041146 Mare Street , Hackney , London , E8 3SG
- Allowed24 October 20233318439East Road, Hackney, N1 7RE
- Allowed5 September 20233304507Cassland Road Sws, Cassland Road, London, E9 5DA
- Dismissed16 August 20233270232Clifden Road, Clapton, London, E9 6DH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®