Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 September 20213261177

Flat 1, 23 Dartmouth Park Hill, London, NW5 1HP

Planning appeal 3261177 at Flat 1, 23 Dartmouth Park Hill, London, NW5 1HP (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 7 September 2021 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed basement development would not compromise the structural integrity of neighbouring properties or the water environment in the local area.

Demolition of existing side and rear extensions, enlargement of existing basement, construction of replacement side and rear extensions, including lightwells to extended area of basement

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cryan M
Postcode
NW5 1HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed basement development would not compromise the structural integrity of neighbouring properties or the water environment in the local area
  • Whether a Construction Management Plan and a contribution towards its monitoring, a construction impact bond, and a contribution towards highway works are necessary, and if so whether an appropriate mechanism for securing these has been provided

What decided it

The absence of an independently verified Basement Impact Assessment demonstrating no harm to neighbouring properties or the water environment, as required by Policy A5, was the decisive factor in dismissing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy A5Policy A1Policy T4Policy DM1Policy A4Policy CC4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 189

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

446 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed18 June 20263377057
    Former Mansfield Bowling Club, Croftdown Road, London, Camden
  2. Allowed5 February 20253352306
    139-147 Camden Road, London, NW1 9HJ
  3. Allowed21 March 20243334298
    8A Hampstead Hill Gardens, London, NW3 2PL
  4. Allowed24 April 20233284957
    17-37 William Road, London, NW1 3ER
  5. Dismissed26 July 20223288791
    10 Prowse Place, London, NW1 9PN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.