Planning appeal decision
Fir Tree Cottage, Netherfield Hill, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 9PP
Planning appeal 3261419 at Fir Tree Cottage, Netherfield Hill, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 9PP (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 10 November 2021 by Inspector Perrins R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).
without planning permission, the material change of use of the land from agricultural use to a mixed use of agriculture and the stationing of caravans for residential purposes (“the Unauthorised Change of Use”) together with associated works
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Perrins R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- The effect upon the adjacent Ancient Woodland
- Whether the appeal site is situated within a sustainable location
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the AONB and adjacent ancient woodland was not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances of the occupiers or the claimed lack of alternative sites.
The significant harm to the AONB and ancient woodland, together with moderate harm from the unsustainable location and limited harm from intentional unauthorised development, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight given to the best interests of the children and personal circumstances, so the balance fell against the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy RA2Policy RA3(v)Policy OSS4(iii)Policy EN1(i)(vii)Policy DEN1Policy DEN2Policy EN5Policy PC1Policy OSS3(v)Policy LHN6(iii)Policy TR3Policy LHN5Policy BEX3Policy BEX3cPolicy GYP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 176Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- AZ v SSCLG & South Gloucestershire DC [2012] EWHC 3660 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed21 August 20263352368The Barn, Woodmans Rest, Bluemans Lane, Westfield, TN33 0SE
- Quashed On Legal Grounds13 July 20263351398Sowdens Gate Wood , Udimore Road , Udimore, East Sussex, TN31 6BG
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263350405Chestnut Wood, Udimore Road, Broad Oak, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 6EU
- Notice upheld24 June 20263353014Glebelands, Potmans Lane, Catsfield, East Sussex, TN33 9BH
- Notice varied and upheld22 June 20263351367Land at Bois De Saussac, Udimore Road , Udimore, Rye, Easy Sussex, TN31 6BG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®