Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted31 August 20213261622

Land at The Digs and The Studio, Heathfield, Kidlington, OX5 3DX

Without the benefit of planning permission, the erection of two units of residential accommodation with associated residential curtilages

Authority
Cherwell District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Roberts J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The 43% volume increase in the replacement building falls below the Council's own established threshold of 50% for what is not materially larger, and thus the development is not inappropriate in the Green Belt, subject to removal of the unacceptably designed rear dormer windows by condition.

Plan policies cited: Policy ESD14, Policy ESD15, Saved policies C28, Saved policies C30

Judgments cited: Hibbitt and Another v SSCLG and Rushcliffe BC [2016]; Oates v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.