Planning appeal decision
Land at The Digs and The Studio, Heathfield, Kidlington, OX5 3DX
Without the benefit of planning permission, the erection of two units of residential accommodation with associated residential curtilages
- Authority
- Cherwell District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Roberts J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
What decided it
The 43% volume increase in the replacement building falls below the Council's own established threshold of 50% for what is not materially larger, and thus the development is not inappropriate in the Green Belt, subject to removal of the unacceptably designed rear dormer windows by condition.
Plan policies cited: Policy ESD14, Policy ESD15, Saved policies C28, Saved policies C30
Judgments cited: Hibbitt and Another v SSCLG and Rushcliffe BC [2016]; Oates v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®