Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld22 November 20223261695

38 Norfolk Road, Ilford, IG3 8LQ

Planning appeal 3261695 at 38 Norfolk Road, Ilford, IG3 8LQ (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 22 November 2022 by Inspector Tweddle J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is suitably located for a house of multiple occupation (HMO).

without planning permission, the material change of use of property from dwellinghouse (Use class: C3) to a large house of multiple occupation (Use class: Sui Generis)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Tweddle J
Postcode
IG3 8LQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is suitably located for a house of multiple occupation (HMO)
  • Whether the development provides satisfactory living conditions for occupants, with regard to space, outlook and light
  • The effect of the development on the character of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise, disturbance and the fear of crime
  • Whether the development provides suitable arrangements for cycle and car parking

What decided it

The development fails to provide satisfactory living conditions for occupants due to lack of light and outlook in communal spaces, is located outside a designated centre contrary to Policy LP6, and would generate unacceptable parking demand that cannot be mitigated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP6Policy LP22Policy LP23Policy LP24Policy LP26Policy T5Policy T6Policy T6.1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

496 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE
  3. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  4. Quashed On Legal Grounds17 September 20263371220
    Waylands Court, Staines Road, Ilford, IG1 2UR
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds17 September 20263370180
    84 Wensleydale Avenue, Ilford, IG5 0NB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.