Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 August 20213261696

86 Hardy Street, MAIDSTONE, ME14 2SJ

a garage and 1 bedroom annexe

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would appear as a subordinate residential annexe and the effect on the character and appearance of the local area
  • The effect on the living conditions of residential occupiers of No.86, with reference to privacy

What decided it

The proposal would appear and function as a small detached house rather than a subordinate annexe, causing significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area and significant harm to the privacy of neighbouring occupiers through direct overlooking.

Framework references: 130, 55, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.