Planning appeal decision
Land to the North of Rosemary Lane, Bran End, Essex, CM6 3RX
Planning appeal 3263440 at Land to the North of Rosemary Lane, Bran End, Essex, CM6 3RX (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 27 August 2021 by Inspector Thompson P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is consistent with policies relating to housing in rural areas, with regard to the protection of the countryside.
up to 60 (maximum) residential dwellings
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Thompson P
- Postcode
- CM6 3RX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is consistent with policies relating to housing in rural areas, with regard to the protection of the countryside
- whether the proposed development makes provision for safe and suitable pedestrian access
- in light of the proposed pedestrian and other access arrangements, whether the proposal would be accessible to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the protected species and habitat of the Hatfield Forest Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and National Nature Reserve (NNR) and the Priority Deciduous Woodland and Bran End Wood Local Wildlife Site
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting of the Grade II listed buildings known as Apple Tree Cottage, Cranford, Stone Cottage and The Green Man
What decided it
The cumulative harm to the countryside, pedestrian and general accessibility, and to the setting of three Grade II listed buildings was found to significantly and comfortably outweigh the proposal's benefits, leading to conflict with the development plan as a whole.
The adverse impacts of the proposal, relating to countryside character, pedestrian and general accessibility, and heritage harm, were found to be matters of significant weight that comfortably outweighed the claimed benefits, including housing land supply boost, affordable housing and economic benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S7Policy GEN1Policy GEN2Policy GEN7Policy ENV7Policy ENV2Policy H1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 48Paragraph 79Paragraph 104Paragraph 105Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 180Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®