Planning appeal decision
Former Police Station (Western Part of the Site), Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 8RP
Planning appeal 3263441 at Former Police Station (Western Part of the Site), Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 8RP (Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council) was dismissed on 24 January 2022 by Inspector Vyse J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the developments proposed on the character and appearance of the sites and the surrounding area, including the detailed design of the buildings in both schemes and green infrastructure provision.
Appeal A: redevelopment of former Police Station (east) incl. demolition of cell block and small extension to create mixed-use development (2 retail/shop units A1, dental surgery D1) and conversion of upper floor offices to 15 apartments (C3); Appeal B: redevelopment of former Police Station (west) incl. part demolition and erection of a stand-alone hot food restaurant/takeaway with drive-through (A3/A5)
- Authority
- Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- other · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Vyse J
- Postcode
- NE4 8RP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the developments proposed on the character and appearance of the sites and the surrounding area, including the detailed design of the buildings in both schemes and green infrastructure provision
- the effect of the proposed access, parking and servicing arrangements on highway safety, when the schemes are considered both individually and in combination
- the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in terms of privacy and noise and disturbance
- whether future occupiers of the development proposed would be provided with acceptable living conditions in relation to outlook, privacy, and noise and disturbance from the Appeal B scheme and from servicing of both sites generally
- the effect of the scheme on the health and wellbeing of local people and communities
What decided it
The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the poor design and materials palette of both schemes (compounded, for Appeal A, by material harm to the privacy of Lynnwood Avenue residents) outweighed the identified benefits.
the substantial housing, economic, and biodiversity benefits of each scheme did not outweigh the significant design-related harm to character and appearance (and, for Appeal A, the material harm to neighbours' privacy), leading to conflict with the development plan as a whole and dismissal of both appeals
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS15Policy DM20Policy CS18Policy DM27Policy DM28Policy DM12Policy CS13Policy DM14Policy CS14Policy DM23Policy DM24Policy HFT4Policy HFT6Policy HFT7Policy HFTA1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 111Paragraph 92Paragraph 120Paragraph 126Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed24 September 20266005950111-115 Grainger Street, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 5AE
- Dismissed6 August 202660066903 Ouston Street, Scotswood, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE15 6AS
- Allowed3 August 2026600652568 Brighton Grove, Arthurs Hill, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5NS
- Dismissed10 July 2026600726543 Queens Road, Jesmond, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 2PR
- Dismissed23 June 20263367599Newcastle City Heliport, Railway Street, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 7AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®