Planning appeal decision
Dormans Court, Cheam Road, Ewell, Surrey, KT17 1QY
Planning appeal 3263592 at Dormans Court, Cheam Road, Ewell, Surrey, KT17 1QY (Epsom and Ewell Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 September 2021 by Inspector Harley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would benefit from permitted development rights under Schedule 2 Part 20, Class A.
prior notification of the proposal to create a two storey roof extension providing 6 no. of new flats
- Authority
- Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harley S
- Postcode
- KT17 1QY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would benefit from permitted development rights under Schedule 2 Part 20, Class A
What decided it
The building fails the permitted development limitation under Paragraph A.1(c) because part of it (the fourth storey) was constructed after 5 March 2018, and the development has already commenced in breach of Paragraph B(16).
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 2026601109120 Bradford Drive, Ewell, KT19 0AH
- Dismissed29 October 2026600473257-61 High Street, Ewell, KT17 1RX
- Dismissed6 October 20266010565Land To The Rear Of 11 Ruxley Close,, West Ewell, KT19 9ND
- Dismissed7 August 2026600640111 Danetree Road, West Ewell, KT19 9SA
- Quashed On Legal Grounds30 July 20263361942The Land Known As 11 Woodlands Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7HW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®