Planning appeal decision
Former Gasholder Site, Homesdale Road, Bromley , BR1 2UE
the construction of a builders’ merchants building (Sui Generis Use) and associated storage and loading areas, creation of new vehicular access to Homesdale Road, a new substation, 6 no. residential dwellings, with associated car and cycle parking, landscaping and associated highway works
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Wilders B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal provides a suitable mix of development and in particular whether the amount of employment floorspace and the quantum and type of housing proposed is acceptable having regard to matters including employment and housing need (including affordable housing), housing supply, the requirements of Policy 1 - Site Allocation 4 of the Bromley Local Plan, density and viability.
What decided it
The significant shortfall in housing against the Site 4 allocation and Policy D3, combined with the Inspector's finding that a policy-compliant scheme could not be shown to have no reasonable prospect of coming forward, meant the harm from this conflict significantly and demonstrably outweighed the proposal's benefits.
The significant harm from conflict with BLP Policy 1 and Site 4 and with LP Policies H1 and D3 outweighed the benefits of affordable housing, employment provision, economic benefits and remediation, such that under the tilted balance the adverse impacts of granting permission significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
Framework references: 11, 122, 60, 62, 63
Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Site 4, Policy H1, Policy D3, Policy 2, Policy H4, Policy 83, Policy E4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®