Planning appeal decision
The Sloop, 5 Commercial Road, Poole, BH14 0HU
Planning appeal 3264947 at The Sloop, 5 Commercial Road, Poole, BH14 0HU (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was allowed on 2 September 2021 by Inspector O'Connor H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the heritage significance of The Sloop public house, a locally listed building.
to demolish the existing public house, outbuilding and 2no. flats and erect a block of 4no. studio flats, 60no. 1 bedroom flats, 9no. 2 bedroom flats and 1no. 3 bedroom flat with parking, cycle and refuse storage
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Connor H
- Postcode
- BH14 0HU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to the heritage significance of The Sloop public house, a locally listed building.
- Whether the proposal would create satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers having regard to the provision of internal space.
- Whether the proposal would make suitable provision for on-site parking.
- The effect of the proposal on international and nationally designated sites of importance for biodiversity.
- If harm arises, whether this is outweighed by other material considerations.
What decided it
The substantial benefits of housing delivery, efficient use of brownfield land and the presumption in favour of sustainable development outweighed the moderate weight attached to the harm from loss of the non-designated heritage asset.
The significant/substantial weight given to housing delivery, efficient use of brownfield land and economic benefits, reinforced by the presumption in favour of sustainable development, outweighed the moderate weight attached to the harm from loss of the locally listed public house and the limited conflict with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- PP2PP26PP27PP28PP30PP32PP34PP35PP39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 105Paragraph 120Paragraph 124Paragraph 130Paragraph 197Paragraph 203Paragraph 204Paragraph 205
- Judgments
- People over Wind and Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta ECLI:EU:C:2018:244
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 September 2026600783665a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
- Allowed28 September 20266007175281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
- Allowed24 September 202660071875 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
- Allowed4 September 2026601111118 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
- Allowed4 September 20266003539Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®