Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20213265097

Seraph Court, 5 Moreland Street, Islington, London, EC1V 8BE

Planning appeal 3265097 at Seraph Court, 5 Moreland Street, Islington, London, EC1V 8BE (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 9 August 2021 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the street scene.

Erection of a 5 storey extension to the existing Seraph Court building to provide 6 no flats- 4 x 3 bed units and 2 x 2 bed units

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Scott A
Postcode
EC1V 8BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the street scene
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with regards to light levels, outlook, and sense of enclosure
  • Whether or not the access into the development would be appropriately located, and the effect of the proposal on pedestrian and highway safety

What decided it

The combination of detrimental harm to character and appearance, unresolved daylight concerns, and pedestrian-vehicle safety conflicts meant the benefits did not clearly outweigh the harms and the proposal conflicted with the development plan.

The limited benefits of the proposal, including some energy efficiency benefits, additional housing stock, and sustainable location, did not clearly outweigh the totality of the harm to character and appearance, daylight amenity, and pedestrian safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy CS 8DMP Policy DM2.1DMP Policy DM2.2DMP Policy DM8.2DMP Policy DM8.5DMP Policy CS 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 805 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.