Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 August 20213265483

3, Grove Park Gardens, London, W4 3RY

the demolition of the existing bungalow and ancillary garage and erection of a two-storey building with accommodation at roof level to create five residential units (3x1-bed/1-person, 2x1-bed/2-person) with associated private and communal amenity space, car parking, refuse and cycle storage. without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref: 00525/3/P7, dated 7 February 2020, as amended by non-material amendment, Ref: 00525/3/P7 (NMA), dated 9 July 2020

Authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hendley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Grove Park Conservation Area
  • whether it would provide suitable living conditions for its future occupiers by way of the internal layout and outlook
  • whether it would make adequate provision for cycle parking
  • the effect on flood risk

What decided it

The proposal would not preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area and would not provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers by way of internal layout and outlook.

The public benefits of improved housing mix and quality compared to the approved scheme would not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, given that great weight must be given to the asset's conservation.

Framework references: 202, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy CC4, Policy SC3, Policy SC5, Policy EC2, Policy EQ3, Policy SI 13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.