Planning appeal decision
Cross Farm, The Cross, Hollington, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 4HH
Planning appeal 3265997 at Cross Farm, The Cross, Hollington, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 4HH (Staffordshire Moorlands District Council) was dismissed on 6 September 2021 by Inspector Hockenhull H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed Yard Farm House, any of the features of special architectural interest that it possesses.
an extension to dwelling. Appeal B: APP/B3438/W/20/3266000 Cross Farm, Main Road, Hollington ST10 4HH
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- ST10 4HH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed Yard Farm House, any of the features of special architectural interest that it possesses
- Appeal A: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building
- Appeal A: the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision
- Appeal B: the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Grade II listed Yard Farm House
- Appeal B: whether the proposal would accord with national and local planning policies for development in the countryside
- Appeal B: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building
- Appeal B: whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, noise and odours
- Appeal B: the effect of the proposal on protected species
What decided it
In Appeal A, the less than substantial but considerable harm to the listed building's special interest could not be outweighed by private benefits alone; in Appeal B, the cumulative failures to accord with countryside development policies, design quality, living conditions, and protected species requirements were decisive.
Appeal A: less than substantial harm to the listed building weighed against private benefits only, which was insufficient to justify the development. Appeal B: no balancing exercise undertaken as the proposal failed to accord with development plan policies on multiple grounds.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DC2Policy DC1Policy SS9Policy SS10Policy H1Policy T1Policy NE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 197Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Staffordshire Moorlands
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed18 May 20263375459Land to the North of Eaves Lane, Armshead, Staffordshire, ST2 8LY
- Dismissed29 April 20266005296Land off Alwoodley, Edge Lane, Endon, Staffordshire, ST9 9DG
- Dismissed27 April 20266004019Far Lakes Farm, Shaw Wall Lane, Whiston, Staffordshire, ST10 2HT
- Allowed26 March 20266002818Apesford Farm, Apesford Lane, Bradnop, Staffordshire, ST13 7EX
- Allowed9 September 20253367834Land at Basford View , Cheddleton, Staffordshire , ST13 7HJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®