Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20213266077

Flat A, 34 Halliford Street, Islington, London, N1 3EL

An existing residential 2 bed maisonette flat on the first and second floors with a butterfly roof over and a small half width rear flat roof extension. The new development is to create a new third floor mansard addition accommodation proving (sic) new third bedroom, new bathroom and new connecting staircase

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposals would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposals would result in less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area with no public benefits to justify that harm, conflicting with the development plan taken as a whole.

Less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, with no public benefits identified, weighed against the development plan; the harm was not justified and the balance tipped against the proposals.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: DM2.1, DM2.3, CS 8, CS 9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.