Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 June 20213266203

28 Deepdene Court, Southgate, London, N21 2NH

Planning appeal 3266203 at 28 Deepdene Court, Southgate, London, N21 2NH (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 30 June 2021 by Inspector Burnham T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding.

demolition of existing bungalow and erection of two 3 bedroom detached house with attached garages

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
N21 2NH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding

What decided it

The absence of evidence in the Flood Risk Assessment to satisfy the sequential test meant the Inspector could not be persuaded that no more suitable sites at lower flood risk existed elsewhere in the borough, making the proposal contrary to development plan policy on flood risk.

The modest housing benefit was outweighed by the significant harm from locating new residential development in an area of high flood risk, contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 28 of the Core Strategy (2010)Policy DMD 59Policy DMD 60Policy DMD 61Policy DMD 62 of Enfield's Development Management Document (2014)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

494 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.