Planning appeal decision
Maan Farm, Southam Road, Near Broadwell, Near Rugby, Rugby, CV23 8HN
Planning appeal 3266487 at Maan Farm, Southam Road, Near Broadwell, Near Rugby, Rugby, CV23 8HN (Rugby Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 16 June 2021 by Inspector Willows P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Barn: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; whether the erection of the barn conflicts with local and national policies aimed at protecting the countryside.
Without planning permission the erection of a barn identified by blue edging on the attached plan and dwelling house identified by blue hatching blue edging on the attached plan1
- Authority
- Rugby Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Willows P
- Postcode
- CV23 8HM
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Barn: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; whether the erection of the barn conflicts with local and national policies aimed at protecting the countryside
- Dwelling: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; whether the location is an appropriate one for a dwelling, having regard to local and national policies which seek to avoid dwellings in isolated locations, and whether the occupiers of the dwelling would be over-reliant on the private car in order to access day-to-day services; whether any harm arising from the development is outweighed by other material considerations
What decided it
The dwelling is in an isolated countryside location requiring over-reliance on private car transport, conflicting with Policy GP2 and NPPF paragraph 79, and the claimed essential need for a rural worker's dwelling is not supported by sufficient evidence of a clearly established business need.
The limited benefits of providing a single new dwelling were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, conflict with countryside protection policies, and the unsustainability of the location, even applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11 due to the absence of a five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GP2Policy H3Policy GP1Policy NE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 127Paragraph 79Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rugby
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263377300Land Adjacent to White House Farm Industrial Estate, Oxford Road, Princethorpe, Rugby, Warwickshire, CV23 9QD
- Notice varied and upheld7 May 20263348732The Chalet, Hinckley Road, Wolvey, LE10 3HQ
- Notice upheld3 March 20263356878The Land at 97 Mckinnell Crescent, Rugby, Warwickshire , CV21 4AU
- Notice upheld19 January 20263354091Peter Hall, Peter Hall Lane, Coombe Fields, Coventry, CV2 2DR
- Planning permission granted5 December 20253367451Land at Fern Field, Oxford Road, Ryton on Dunsmore, CV8 3EP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®