Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 September 20213266499

86 Clapham Common West Side, London, SW4 9AY

Planning appeal 3266499 at 86 Clapham Common West Side, London, SW4 9AY (London Borough of Wandsworth) was allowed on 24 September 2021 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the revisions proposed as part of the amended plans would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Clapham Common Conservation Area.

the excavation of floorspace at basement level, including formation of front lightwell and insertion of new windows/doors, in connection with provision of a one bedroom flat within basement area; erection of a three storey (ground, first and second floor level) rear extension to the side of the back addition to provide additional floorspace for the existing flats without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2011/5574, dated 27 February 2012

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
SW4 9AY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the revisions proposed as part of the amended plans would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Clapham Common Conservation Area

What decided it

The revised design would preserve the character and appearance of the Clapham Common Conservation Area because the extension is largely imperceptible from public viewpoints and does not represent a discordant feature.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMS1Policy DMS2Policy DMH5Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

603 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011378
    First and Second Floor Maisonette, 184 Putney Bridge Road, London, SW15 2NG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011258
    8 Mysore Road, London, SW11 5SB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266010452
    72 Frensham Drive, London, SW15 3EF
  4. Allowed26 October 20266013180
    23, Sutherland Grove, London, SW18 5PS
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266014390
    5 Banbury Street,, London, SW11 3EJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.