Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20223266511

17 Lopen Road, London, N18 1PN

Planning appeal 3266511 at 17 Lopen Road, London, N18 1PN (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 21 January 2022 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the area.

to extend and carry out a loft conversion to the existing property to provide 2No, 2 Bed/3 person maisonette flats

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Buchanan R
Postcode
N18 1PN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the area
  • the living conditions of existing occupiers of No 15 Lopen Road, with regard to privacy, outlook and natural light
  • the living conditions of future occupiers of the upper flat, with regard to internal habitable space and external amenity space, and of the lower flat with respect to privacy
  • the provision of family accommodation

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the appeal property and area, combined with harm to the living conditions of existing and future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of a net gain of one home.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Policy CP30Core Strategy Policy CP4Core Strategy Policy CP5Development Management Policy DMD6Development Management Policy DMD11Development Management Policy DMD13Development Management Policy DMD37Development Management Policy DMD8Development Management Policy DMD9Development Management Policy DMD5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

387 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.