Planning appeal decision
Kilmarnock Farm , Ifield Road , Charlwood , West Sussex, RH11 0JY
Planning appeal 3266534 at Kilmarnock Farm , Ifield Road , Charlwood , West Sussex, RH11 0JY (West Sussex County Council) was dismissed on 26 June 2023 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon Habitats sites.
Temporary Concrete Crushing and Soil Recycling Facility
- Authority
- West Sussex County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- minerals-waste · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- RH11 0JY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon Habitats sites
- whether or not the proposed development is compliant with policies in respect of flood risk
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the countryside
- whether or not the proposed development would ensure satisfactory conditions for neighbouring and local receptors with particular reference to noise and dust
- the effect of the proposed development upon any future expansion of Gatwick Airport
- whether or not the proposed development is in a suitable location on the highway network and can be accessed safely
What decided it
The proposal fails to comply with the Habitats Regulations as it cannot be demonstrated that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the Arun Valley Habitats sites, which alone precludes the development from proceeding.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy W10Policy W4Policy W3Policy W14Policy 31Policy W11Policy W12Policy 25Policy 26Policy 33Policy W19Policy W18Policy 40Policy W1Policy GAT2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 159Paragraph 161Paragraph 162Paragraph 163Paragraph 180Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 188Paragraph 185Paragraph 106Paragraph 110Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Sussex County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed13 February 20233282246Lower Stumble Exploration Site, London Road, Balcombe , Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH17 6JH
- Unknown24 March 20263349228Appeal 3349228
- Dismissed16 March 20263376452Land to the North of 24 Oak Hall Park, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 0BX
- Unknown10 February 20263367704Midhurst Common, West Sussex, GU29 9LF
- Unknown10 February 20263367697Midhurst Common, West Sussex, GU29 9LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®