Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 June 20213266896

70, Prince George Ave, Southgate, N14 4SP

Planning appeal 3266896 at 70, Prince George Ave, Southgate, N14 4SP (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 14 June 2021 by Inspector Andrews M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the raised patio and its adjacent boundary fence on the living conditions for the occupiers of No. 68, with particular reference to outlook and light.

Construction of a raised patio and fencing to the rear (retrospective)

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Andrews M
Postcode
N14 4SP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the raised patio and its adjacent boundary fence on the living conditions for the occupiers of No. 68, with particular reference to outlook and light

What decided it

The substantial width and length of the neighbouring garden and its favourable aspect away from the dwelling significantly offset the restricted outlook and enclosure caused by the higher boundary fence.

The adverse effect on outlook and perception of enclosure was significantly offset by the substantial width and length of the neighbouring garden and the benefit of the fence preventing overlooking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

323 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.