Planning appeal decision
Ruddles Pool , Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5TW
Planning appeal 3267862 at Ruddles Pool , Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5TW (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 16 November 2021 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
part change of use of dwelling (C3) to a place of worship (D1) with improved vehicular access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Change of use
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- SL4 5TW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to noise and disturbance
- whether or not the need for the proposed development has been justified in this location
- whether or not the specific circumstances of the appellant justify the proposed development
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, combined with moderate harm to character and appearance, significant harm to highway safety, and adverse effects on residential living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of providing a place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community.
The substantial weight given to the harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, moderate harm to character and appearance, and significant harm to highway safety and residential amenity was not clearly outweighed by the substantial weight given to the provision of a permanent place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community and the advancement of equality of opportunity under the Public Sector Equality Duty.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy GB8Policy DG1Policy N2Policy T5Policy NAP3Policy CF3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Allowed7 September 20266008689Primrose Farm, Bradcutts Lane, Cookham Dean, Maidenhead, SL6 9TL
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®