Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20213267862

Ruddles Pool , Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5TW

Planning appeal 3267862 at Ruddles Pool , Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5TW (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 16 November 2021 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

part change of use of dwelling (C3) to a place of worship (D1) with improved vehicular access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector
Pipkin R
Postcode
SL4 5TW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether or not the need for the proposed development has been justified in this location
  • whether or not the specific circumstances of the appellant justify the proposed development
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, combined with moderate harm to character and appearance, significant harm to highway safety, and adverse effects on residential living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of providing a place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community.

The substantial weight given to the harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, moderate harm to character and appearance, and significant harm to highway safety and residential amenity was not clearly outweighed by the substantial weight given to the provision of a permanent place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community and the advancement of equality of opportunity under the Public Sector Equality Duty.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy GB8Policy DG1Policy N2Policy T5Policy NAP3Policy CF3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 150

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

98 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  3. Allowed7 September 20266008689
    Primrose Farm, Bradcutts Lane, Cookham Dean, Maidenhead, SL6 9TL
  4. Dismissed4 September 20266009260
    2 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
  5. Notice upheld10 August 20263369085
    Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.