Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20213267862

Ruddles Pool , Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 5TW

part change of use of dwelling (C3) to a place of worship (D1) with improved vehicular access

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether or not the need for the proposed development has been justified in this location
  • whether or not the specific circumstances of the appellant justify the proposed development
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, combined with moderate harm to character and appearance, significant harm to highway safety, and adverse effects on residential living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of providing a place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community.

The substantial weight given to the harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, moderate harm to character and appearance, and significant harm to highway safety and residential amenity was not clearly outweighed by the substantial weight given to the provision of a permanent place of worship and community facility for the local Muslim community and the advancement of equality of opportunity under the Public Sector Equality Duty.

Framework references: 137, 138, 147, 148, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy GB1, Policy GB8, Policy DG1, Policy N2, Policy T5, Policy NAP3, Policy CF3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.