Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision2 March 20223267880

Post box, Buttons Meadow, Charsfield, IP13 7QE

Provision of a dwelling (temporary), and the change of use of land, alteration/improvement of existing barn to stabling, ménage and equine working school, erection of additional stables, siting of ancillary equipment and associated hard and soft landscaping

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
agricultural · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pannell G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate an essential functional need for a rural worker to live permanently on the appeal site, as the risks to horse welfare and the therapy business could be adequately mitigated without an on-site dwelling.

the conflict with the development plan and the lack of demonstrated essential need for the temporary dwelling was not outweighed by any other considerations, including the Framework, so that element was dismissed, while the change of use element, causing no harm, was allowed

Framework references: 80

Plan policies cited: Policy SCLP3.3, Policy SCLP5.3, Policy SCLP5.6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.