Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 August 20213267914

Land on Kelross Road at the Rear of No.1 Ardilaun Road, Kelross Road, London, N5 2QN

Planning appeal 3267914 at Land on Kelross Road at the Rear of No.1 Ardilaun Road, Kelross Road, London, N5 2QN (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 10 August 2021 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sotheby Road Conservation Area (CA).

New single storey one bedroom one person C3 residential dwellinghouse on Kelross Road, N5, on unoccupied land at the rear of 1 Ardilaun Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Scott A
Postcode
N5 2QN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sotheby Road Conservation Area (CA)
  • The effect on the living conditions of local residents in respect of outlook, sense of enclosure and light levels
  • The effect on the living conditions of future residents in respect of outdoor space, outlook, light levels, and sense of enclosure
  • Whether or not the proposal would be inclusive design in relation to access

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, combined with harm to the living conditions of both existing and future occupants and failure to achieve inclusive design, could not be justified by the modest public benefits of providing a single additional dwelling.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area, harm to neighbouring living conditions, and harm to future occupants' living conditions were weighed against the modest public benefits of providing additional housing, ground condition improvements, and environmental efficiencies; the harm outweighed the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DM2.1DM2.2DM2.3DM3.4DM3.5DM6.3CS 8CS 9CS 12CS 15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 731 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.