®Planning appeal decision
Upper Flat, 50 Silver Crescent, Chiswick, LONDON, W4 5SE
the proposed works include alterations to the existing roof extension and minor internal changes to the layout
- Authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Phillips B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing property, surrounding area and the Thorney Hedge Conservation Area
What decided it
The private benefits of improved accommodation did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the host property.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area as a designated heritage asset, to which great weight was attached, was not outweighed by private benefits which do not constitute public benefits.
Framework references: 202
Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy SC7, Supplementary Planning Document Residential Extension Guidelines (2017)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.