Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20213268183

Leigh House Hotel, 1 Leigh Street, London, WC1H 9EW

Planning appeal 3268183 at Leigh House Hotel, 1 Leigh Street, London, WC1H 9EW (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 30 September 2021 by Inspector Rann J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would preserve the grade II listed building identified in the list description as "Numbers 1, 2 and 3 and attached railings, 1, 2 and 3 Leigh Street" and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

Creation of a new enclosed reception area at ground floor level through the removal of the former small guest room. Removal of former reception kiosk. Introduction of a double guest room and en suite bathroom on the basement floor level in the former breakfast room, breakfast room moved to rear of building in former single guest room. Introduction of a new fire escape corridor allowing escape access to the front of the building from the new basement bedroom, entailing: the introduction of a new partition between this corridor and the adjacent kitchen, swapping the location of the window and door on the basement's northern facade, re- using the door and replacing the non-original window frame with a new timber framed sash

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Rann J
Postcode
WC1H 9EW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposals would preserve the grade II listed building identified in the list description as "Numbers 1, 2 and 3 and attached railings, 1, 2 and 3 Leigh Street" and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • the effect of the proposals on the character or appearance of the Bloomsbury Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed basement door, fitted flush with the adjacent walls rather than in a deep reveal consistent with the building's fenestration pattern, would disrupt the strong rhythm of the listed building's elevations and harm its special interest and the conservation area's character, and this harm was not outweighed by the moderate weight afforded to unproven fire safety benefits.

The considerable importance and weight given to the harm to the listed building and conservation area was not outweighed by the moderate weight afforded to the public benefits of fire safety improvements, as the necessity of the specific harmful works was not demonstrated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2
Judgments
Palmer v Herefordshire Council & Anr [2016] EWCA Civ 1061

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 810 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.