Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20213268760

110 Cockfosters Road, Barnet, EN4 0DP

Planning appeal 3268760 at 110 Cockfosters Road, Barnet, EN4 0DP (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 12 August 2021 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling with regards to outlook and light.

a two storey rear extension incorporating 1 self-contained flat at first floor and garage on ground floor

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
EN4 0DP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling with regards to outlook and light
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for secure, covered, convenient, and accessible cycle parking
  • whether the proposal would make suitable provision for refuse and recycling storage and collection

What decided it

The unacceptably poor outlook for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling, which would constitute significant harm to living conditions that outweighed the limited housing supply benefits of a single unit.

the significant harm to living conditions from poor outlook outweighed the limited contribution of one additional dwelling to the Council's housing supply shortfall, such that adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed benefits

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMD8Policy DMD37Policy CP4Policy CP30Policy D6Policy T5Policy DMD45Policy DMD47Policy CP24Policy CP28
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 127

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

343 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.