Planning appeal decision
44 Hyde Vale, London, SE10 8HP
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cramond D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality
What decided it
The Juliette balcony at first floor level was found to be an uncharacteristic and aesthetically inappropriate feature that would be visible from the public realm and contrary to good design, and because it was inextricably linked to the rear extension works, this led to dismissal of the entire rear element of the proposal.
Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy HC2, Policy DH(h), Policy DH3, Policy DH4, Policy D3, Policy DH1, Policy DH(a)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®