Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision1 March 20223268903

44 Hyde Vale, London, SE10 8HP

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cramond D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality

What decided it

The Juliette balcony at first floor level was found to be an uncharacteristic and aesthetically inappropriate feature that would be visible from the public realm and contrary to good design, and because it was inextricably linked to the rear extension works, this led to dismissal of the entire rear element of the proposal.

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy HC2, Policy DH(h), Policy DH3, Policy DH4, Policy D3, Policy DH1, Policy DH(a)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.