Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 October 20213268962

82 Reidhaven Road, Plumstead, London, SE18 1BU

Planning appeal 3268962 at 82 Reidhaven Road, Plumstead, London, SE18 1BU (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was allowed on 15 October 2021 by Inspector Leigh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is consistent with the Council's policies regarding the provision of housing of a satisfactory standard in the Borough.

the change of use from residential (Class C3) to HMO (Class C4) and a rear dormer

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Leigh C
Postcode
SE18 1BU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is consistent with the Council's policies regarding the provision of housing of a satisfactory standard in the Borough
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The planning condition limiting occupancy to 5 persons is enforceable and precise because any breach would require an unlawful HMO license, providing clear proof of non-compliance.

The benefits of providing housing of a satisfactory standard and the fallback position of the lawful dormer outweighed any concerns about the HMO use and the minor deviation in the dormer design.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy H5 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014)Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

306 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  2. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
  3. Unknown14 July 20263374853
    Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
  4. Dismissed6 July 20263376767
    2-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
  5. Allowed19 June 20266000585
    278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.