Planning appeal decision
Former Stable Yard , New Barn Lane , Little Hallingbury , Herts , CM22 7PR
Planning appeal 3268974 at Former Stable Yard , New Barn Lane , Little Hallingbury , Herts , CM22 7PR (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 11 October 2021 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Full planning application relating to the erection of a new dwelling and carte lodge at Former Stable Yard, New Barn Lane, Little Hallingbury, Bishops Stortford CM22 7PR
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- CM22 7PR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the use of the proposed access on the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and drivers using New Barn Lane
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to its openness and would also harm highway safety, and these harms would not be outweighed by the limited housing and economic benefits.
the limited contribution to housing supply and economic benefits did not outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and moderate harm to openness, combined with harm to highway safety
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S6Policy GEN1Policy GEN2Policy S7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Wood v SoS CLG and another [2014] EWHC 683
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Allowed15 January 20263373483Land Adj to Greylands Barn , Chelmsford Road, White Roding, Dunmow, CM6 1RF
- Dismissed13 January 20263373643Land Adj to South View, Maple Lane, Wimbish, Essex, CB10 2XG
- Dismissed23 September 20253364102Land South of Birchanger Lane , Birchanger Lane , Birchanger , Bishops Stortford
- Dismissed15 August 20253366933Lock Farm House Dell Lane, Spellbrook, Bishop's Stortford, CM22 7SG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®