Planning appeal decision
Asmall Hall Care Home, Asmall Lane, Scarisbrick, Ormskirk, L40 8JL
Planning appeal 3269136 at Asmall Hall Care Home, Asmall Lane, Scarisbrick, Ormskirk, L40 8JL (West Lancashire District Council) was dismissed on 28 October 2021 by Inspector Hockenhull H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
a two-storey extension to the rear and single storey extension to adjacent lounge
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- L40 8JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, Coach House approximately 20 metres east of Asmall House (Ref: 1073111) and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
- the effect of the development on protected species, in particular bats
- if the development is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, including the contribution to elderly care provision, such that very special circumstances did not exist.
The significant harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness, given substantial weight, were not clearly outweighed by the considerable weight given to elderly care provision and the neutral factors of heritage preservation and protected species, resulting in the absence of very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN4Policy EN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 148Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 197
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lancashire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed13 October 202660137566 Moss Lane, Bickerstaffe, L39 0EX
- Allowed5 October 20266010014Land at Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall, West Lancs, L39 8SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266007428Land Adjacent to Model Farm, Plex Lane, Halsall, Ormskirk, L39 7JY
- Dismissed15 September 202660121883 Broad Lane, Downholland, Ormskirk, L39 7HS
- Allowed14 September 20266007163Prince Williams Inn, Beacon Lane, Dalton, WN8 7RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®