Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20213269194

7 Bramley Avenue, Coulsdon, surrey, CR5 2DR

demolition of existing building and erection of a part 3 storey, part 4 storey building with accommodation within the roof space containing 2 x 1 bedroom, 5 x 2 bedroom and 2 x 3 bedroom apartments with associated parking

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowyer J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 5 Bramley Avenue with particular regard to outlook
  • whether or not the proposed access and parking arrangements would be acceptable with specific regard to the level and accessibility of parking provision
  • whether or not living conditions for future occupiers of the development would be acceptable with particular regard to outlook and light
  • whether or not provision for cycle storage would be acceptable

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, combined with unacceptable parking provision, outweighed the limited benefit of 8 additional dwellings.

The benefits of housing delivery and effective site use were outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, harm to neighbouring living conditions through loss of outlook, and unacceptable parking arrangements.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy DM10, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy T5, Policy T6, Policy T6.1, Policy D3, Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.