Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 August 20213269222

7B Golf Ride, ENFIELD, EN2 9DA

redevelopment of the site by the erection of three dwellinghouses

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowyer J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 3, 5, 7 and 7a Golf Ride with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the proposal on flood risk with particular regard to surface water drainage
  • the effect of the proposal on the safety and convenience of users of the adjacent highway network with particular regard to the adequacy of the access arrangements for delivery, servicing and emergency vehicles

What decided it

The previous planning permission for 2 bungalows on the site established the principle of rear development and provided a material comparison showing that the proposed 3 dwellings would not result in significantly different impacts.

The benefits of residential development on an underutilised site in an existing residential area, with effective use of land and compliance with density standards, outweighed the concerns about increased built form, which were mitigated by appropriate spacing, design, and conditions.

Framework references: 54, 56, 57

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 30, Core Policy 21, Core Policy 28, Policy DMD 6, Policy DMD 7, Policy DMD 8, Policy DMD 9, Policy DMD 10, Policy DMD 37, Policy DMD 45, Policy DMD 47, Policy DMD 60, Policy DMD 61, Policy SI 13, Policy T4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.