Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 October 20213269437

3 High Street, Brentford, TW8 0DX

Planning appeal 3269437 at 3 High Street, Brentford, TW8 0DX (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 13 October 2021 by Inspector Davies B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not cycle storage would be sufficient.

demolition of the existing public house and construction of a three storey building with lower ground floor (following terrain of the existing site) to create four new dwellings and a community use space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Davies B
Postcode
TW8 0DX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not cycle storage would be sufficient
  • whether or not the proposal meets the requirements of local and national policy with regard to flood risk and incorporation of sustainable urban drainage systems
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed community use meets the requirements of local policy with regard to protection of these facilities

What decided it

The proposal failed to demonstrate sufficient cycle storage provision and failed to apply the sequential test for flood risk, which together outweighed the benefits of four new dwellings and acceptable character and community use outcomes.

The benefits of four new dwellings, acceptable character and appearance, and compliant community use were outweighed by the failures to provide sufficient cycle storage and to demonstrate the sequential test for flood risk.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EC2Policy EQ3Policy CC1Policy CC2Policy CI1Policy D1Policy D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 167

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

407 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011171
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266007899
    92 Windmill Road, Brentford, TW8 9NA
  3. Dismissed22 September 20266010335
    38 Abinger Road, Chiswick, W4 1EX
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266006466
    88A Crispen Road, Feltham, TW13 6QR
  5. Dismissed10 July 20266006681
    395 Twickenham Road, Isleworth, TW7 7ES

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.