Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20213269680

52 & 54 Greys Road, Henley-on-Thames, RG9 1TF

Planning appeal 3269680 at 52 & 54 Greys Road, Henley-on-Thames, RG9 1TF (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2021 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

described as, “Retention of existing bungalow at no. 54, demolition of bungalow and garages at no. 52, erection of 3 x 2 bed terraced cottages and 2 x 2 bed, 2 storey flats, including the provision of 6 on site parking bays (4 partially enclosed), associated retaining walls and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
RG9 1TF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the setting of the Henley Main Conservation Area
  • parking and highway safety

What decided it

The combined harm to character and appearance and to the setting of the conservation area, which was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing provision and mix.

the moderate public benefits of housing provision and mix did not outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance and the less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DES1Policy DES2Policy ENV6Policy ENV8Policy TRANS5Policy T1 of the Neighbourhood Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 124Paragraph 109Paragraph 68

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

60 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed7 October 20266005521
    Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR
  2. Allowed9 September 20266011224
    The Elms, Woodperry Road, Beckley, OX3 9UZ
  3. Allowed7 July 20266005839
    Land at Watlington Road, Lewknor, OX49 5TS
  4. Allowed5 June 20266004647
    Meadow View, Beech Lane, Woodcote, RG8 0PX
  5. Allowed23 April 20266001457
    81 Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, Oxfordshire, OX39 4EA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.