Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 June 20213269702

Good Technology, 355 Newmarket Road, Cambridge, CB5 8JG

Planning appeal 3269702 at Good Technology, 355 Newmarket Road, Cambridge, CB5 8JG (Cambridge City Council) was dismissed on 21 June 2021 by Inspector Smith A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, having particular regard to the intended makeup of the communal amenity area and external private amenity spaces to serve Unit 1.

Demolition of existing and construction of seven dwellings and associated external works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith A
Postcode
CB5 8JG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, having particular regard to the intended makeup of the communal amenity area and external private amenity spaces to serve Unit 1
  • Whether it has been adequately demonstrated that the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupiers of Units 3, 5 and 7, having particular regard to noise generated by neighbouring commercial activities
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for potential future residential occupiers of Nos 351 and 353, having particular regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The failure to adequately demonstrate acceptable living conditions for Unit 3 due to unresolved noise and amenity space uncertainties, combined with significant overlooking harm to the privacy of future occupiers of Nos 351 and 353, were the overriding considerations that led to dismissal.

The modest benefits of seven additional residential units and construction-phase employment were outweighed by the significant harms to living conditions of Unit 3 occupiers (noise) and Nos 351 and 353 occupiers (privacy).

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 50Policy 56Policy 57Policy 35

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

236 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cambridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed30 March 20266001460
    28 Carlyle Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB4 3DN
  2. Dismissed9 March 20263372897
    Pavement Adj to Grafton Centre, , Burleigh Street, Cambridge, CB1 1PS
  3. Dismissed9 March 20263372896
    Pavement Adj to Grafton Centre,, Burleigh Street, Cambridge, CB1 1PS
  4. Dismissed10 November 20253372900
    Pavement O/S 58 Regent Street, Cambridge
  5. Dismissed10 November 20253372899
    Pavement O/S 58 Regent Street, Cambridge, CB2 1DP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.