Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20213269739

113 High Street, Barnet, London, EN5 5UZ

Planning appeal 3269739 at 113 High Street, Barnet, London, EN5 5UZ (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 29 September 2021 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance and visual amenity of the area.

the installation of a public payphone that will include an interactive public information screen and an illuminated sequential display. The unit is a communication hub that will enable the public to access online facilities and functions, including wayfinding and publicly accessible defibrillator, at no cost to the user

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Plenty B
Postcode
EN5 5UZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance and visual amenity of the area
  • the effect of the proposed communication hub on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would result in substantial harm to highway safety by obstructing pedestrian sightlines at a busy traffic-controlled crossing and would harm the character and appearance of the area by creating visual clutter in an otherwise open and uncluttered footway.

The limited benefits of the communication hub's public services were outweighed by the substantial harm to highway safety and the harm to character and appearance of the area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM01Policy DM17CS5Barnet Design Guidance Note 1: Advertising and Signs
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 112

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

341 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barnet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed14 April 20266001389
    Barnet Burnt Oak Leisure Centre, Watling Avenue, Edgeware, HA8 0NP
  2. Allowed17 March 20266000469
    Springwell Centre, Barnet Hospital, London, EN5 3DJ
  3. Allowed18 February 20266001161
    Grass Verge on Langford Road, Barnet, London, EN4 9TY
  4. Dismissed14 January 20266001204
    Outside 780-782, Finchley Road, London, NW11 7TH
  5. Allowed16 December 20253361106
    Grass Verge Between Grahame Park Way and Avion Crescent, Colindale, London, NW9 5QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.