Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 August 20213269928

6 Horton Gardens, Datchet Road, Horton, SLOUGH, SL3 9PX

erection of a first floor with new dormer windows, new front door canopy and alteration to fenestration

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sedgwick P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if there would be harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, whether the harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The disproportionate nature of the extension (99.12% increase in floorspace) constituted inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the harm caused by inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The substantial weight afforded to harm caused by inappropriateness in the Green Belt was not outweighed by the absence of other harms or the negligible weight of the fallback position, such that very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 149, 137

Plan policies cited: GB1, GB4, NP/OE4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.