Planning appeal decision
Telecommunications Site, York Road, Woodthorpe, York, YO24 4NR
Planning appeal 3270774 at Telecommunications Site, York Road, Woodthorpe, York, YO24 4NR (City of York Council) was dismissed on 20 July 2021 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with due regard to the Acomb Conservation Area.
the installation of a new 20.0m column supporting 6 no antennas, together with ground-based equipment cabinets and ancillary development thereto
- Authority
- City of York Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Cross D
- Postcode
- YO24 4NR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with due regard to the Acomb Conservation Area
What decided it
The appellants failed to demonstrate that the identified public benefits of the proposal in this specific location outweigh the significant harm to character and appearance and the less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area, particularly given the availability of potentially more suitably located alternative sites in the vicinity.
The economic and social benefits of improved telecommunications infrastructure and 5G provision were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area, because alternative sites in the vicinity had not been demonstrated to be unfeasible.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy D4Policy C1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 196Paragraph 113Paragraph 127
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of York Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 August 20266010434Footpath Outside Domino’s, 8 Matmer House, Hull Road, York, YO10 3JW
- Allowed26 October 20266010725Agricultural Building, Moor Lane, Skelton, YO32 2RE
- Allowed21 October 2026601424014 Howard Drive, Rawcliffe, York, YO30 5XB
- Dismissed21 October 202660122115 Linden Grove, York, YO30 6NX
- Allowed16 October 20266011765Hall Farm, Strensall Road, York, YO32 9SW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®