Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 July 20213270789

Wilbrook, Blue Stone Lane, Mawdesley, Chorley, Lancashire, L40 2RG

Planning appeal 3270789 at Wilbrook, Blue Stone Lane, Mawdesley, Chorley, Lancashire, L40 2RG (Chorley Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 July 2021 by Inspector Hitchcock R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the locality.

the demolition of a detached dwelling (known as Wilbrook) including various outbuildings and the construction of five detached 2 storey dwelling and associated external works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hitchcock R
Postcode
L40 2RG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the locality

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the locality, arising from the regimented layout and hard surfacing that would contrast with the dispersed, organically-arranged character of the area, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefit of 3 additional housing units.

The significant harm to character and appearance was weighed against the moderate benefit of 3 additional dwellings and the Council's housing land supply shortfall; the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BNE1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 11d

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

21 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chorley Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266010419
    Sibbering's Farmhouse, Dawson Lane, Chorley, PR6 7DT
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266007934
    Fleetwood Farm, North Road, Bretherton, PR26 9AY
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266013193
    47 Washington Lane, Euxton, Chorley, PR7 6DQ
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013467
    3 Hard Field Close, Buckshaw Village, PR7 7GB
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266012610
    Land Adjacent To St Johns C Of E And Methodist Primary School, School Lane, Brinscall, PR26 6TD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.